• “False complaints are no longer good…”


• Notice of Supreme Court to Center and States and Human Rights Commission


• ‘Indian Code of Justice’ and Protection of Innocent Citizens

Supreme Court News: Supreme Court Today, playing an important role in two different cases Central Govt(Central Government) State Governments and ‘NCERT’ have been kept on edge. Taking cognizance of the harassment of innocent citizens due to false complaints, the court has sought a response from the administration, while on the other hand it has reprimanded the education council for tarnishing the image of the judiciary.

Demand for putting ‘caution warning’ in police stations

While hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay, the Supreme Court has issued notices to the Centre, all state governments and the National Human Rights Commission. The petition made an important demand: “Boards should be put up in the premises of every police station and public institution clearly stating that – if anyone gives false complaint, false evidence or misleading information, they will face strict legal action as per the provisions of the ‘Indian Justice Code’ (BNS).”

‘Indian Code of Justice’ and Protection of Innocent Citizens

Explaining the basic purpose of this public interest litigation, the bench noted that often innocent citizens are implicated in false crimes due to personal disputes or ulterior motives. This violates their dignity and human rights. The earlier Indian Penal Code (IPC) lacked effective provisions against false complaints, but the new ‘Indian Justice Code’ (BNS) has introduced penal provisions for such offences. The court said that the person making the complaint should also know the consequences of his actions, so that misuse of the law can be stopped.

Controversy over NCERT book; 5 crore pending cases in the judiciary angered the CJI

Supreme Court ‘contempt’ notice to NCERT

During today’s hearing, Supreme Court Chief Justice Suryakant gave a stern word to the National Council of Research and Training (NCERT). It came to light that a separate subject titled ‘Judiciary Corruption’ has been added to the Class 8 syllabus. The court took cognizance of this matter and heard it.

Confusion about the Judiciary in the minds of students

The Chief Justice’s bench said, “Council has attempted to bring the judiciary into disrepute in a manner which will not be tolerated under any circumstances.” The court has issued a ‘show cause’ notice to clarify the reasons behind creating confusion in the minds of students about the judiciary by including such a subject in the syllabus. Not only this, a ‘contempt notice’ has also been issued regarding this action as contempt of court.

Awaiting response from administration

Both these roles of the Supreme Court have created a great stir in administrative and academic circles. Legal experts are now keen to see what action the government will take on the false complaints and what clarification NCERT will give on its controversial lesson.

‘Love jihad’ case! Does the marriage of a Hindu girl to a Muslim harm the structure of the country? The Supreme Court rebuked the film